Talk:Long and short scales
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Long and short scales article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Long and short scales has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Milliard page were merged into Long and short scales. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Population numbers
Using the most recent numbers in the Wikipedia articles on each country, I've compiled the following. Of course, most totals are at best correct to nearest million only.
Australia.... 21 855 016 Hong Kong 7 008 900 Ireland Rep 4 422 100 New Zealand 4 315 800 Phillipines.. 91 983 000 Singapore.. 4 737 000 UK............ 61 113 205 USA.......... 307 293 000 English language-speaking countries and regions, total 502 728 021 Brazil........ 191 241 714 Bulgaria..... 7 605 551 Estonia..... 1 340 415 Indonesia... 229 965 000 Iran........... 74 196 000 Israel......... 7 411 000 Latvia........ 2 231 503 Lithuania... 3 555 179 Romania.... 21 498 616 Russia...... 142 008 838 Turkey....... 74 816 000 Wales....... 3 004 600 (counted in UK too) Other short scale languages and countries, total 758 874 416 Grece........ 11 257 285 Short scale use but with other terminology, total 11 257 285 Short scale countries, total 1 269 855 122 (counting Wales only once) Andorra..... 84 484 Argentina... 40 482 000 Austria...... 8 356 707 Belgium..... 10 665 867 Bosnia+Herz 4 613 414 Chile......... 16 928 873 Colombia... 44 982 970 Costa Rica 4 509 290 Croatia...... 4 489 409 Czech Rep 10 476 543 Denmark... 5 519 441 Dominican Rep 10 090 000 Ecuador.... 13 625 000 El Salvador 5 744 113 Finland...... 5 342 344 France...... 64 303 482 Germany... 82 060 000 Guatemala. 14 000 000 Hungary.... 10 020 000 Iceland...... 319 756 Italy.......... 60 088 880 Liechtenstein 35 446 Luxembourg 493 500 Mexico...... 111 211 789 Monaco..... 32 965 Netherlands 16 500 156 Norway...... 4 833 665 Paraguay... 6 349 000 Peru.......... 29 132 013 Poland...... 38 130 302 Portugal.... 10 707 924 Serbia....... 7 365 507 Slovakia.... 5 379 455 Slovenia.... 2 053 355 Spain........ 46 661 950 Sweden..... 9 236 872 Switzerland 7 739 100 Uruguay.... 3 361 000 Venezuela. 26 814 843 Long scale countries, total 742 741 415 Canada..... 33 766 000 Puerto Rico 3 994 259 (counted in USA too) South Africa 49 320 000 Both long and short scales countries, total 87 080 259 Long or short scales countries, total 2 098 687 137 (counting Puerto Rico only once) People's China 1 345 751 000 India.......... 1 198 003 000 Pakistan.... 180 808 000 Bangladesh 162 221 000 Nepal........ 29 331 000 Burma....... 50 020 000 Japan........ 127 590 000 South Korea 48 379 392 North Korea 23 906 000 Neither short nor long scale countries, total 3 166 009 392 Total population accounted for 5 261 691 929 Total world population 6 781 000 000 Population unaccounted for 1 519 308 071
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Noe (talk • contribs) 2 September 2009
References
The last remaining peer review comment is that there are too few references for an article of this length. Can any followers of this article, particularly with foreign languages, add further references from reliable sources, please? - Ian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.123.238 (talk) 7 June 2012
References
Greenland Suggestion
As suggested by archive 5, there's nothing about naming large numbers in traditional Greenlandic numerals. I think the table on "Neither" should be about systems for naming large numbers that are neither long scale nor short scale - not about systems for naming numbers that do not have names for large numbers. Thus, I think Greenland should be removed from the table. I believe one speaking in Greenlandic would use loan words from Danish or pehaps increasingly English, i.e. either long or short scale - not "neither".--Nø (talk) 08:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
The map is inconsistent with the article, for the UK
According to the map, current usage in the UK is both long and short scales, whereas according to the article, current usage in the UK is exclusively short scale and has been since 1974. Can someone please correct the map? 86.9.85.159 (talk) 02:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- I support the above request. I have occasionally found Americans confused by the British (or Irish) use of billion because they have been told that in Britain billion means a million million (and when writing stuff with an American audience in mind I have thus sometimes felt a mildly irritated need to add an otherwise unnecessary note to try to preempt any such possible confusion). Wikipedia should not be helping to perpetuate such confusion. You do very rarely find a (usually elderly or contrarian) British or Irish person who insists that a billion means a million million, but Wikipedia quite rightly does not try to mislead its non-British readers by portraying Britain as divided over the question of whether the Earth is round simply because somewhere in Britain there is a Flat Earth Society. Tlhslobus (talk) 11:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- I'm planning to put in a map-change request, but I don't have time to check the procedure right now, and I may easily forget to do so later, so if somebody a few weeks (at least 4) from now sees that I have apparently forgotten, they might consider either putting in a request themselves or leaving me a reminder on my Talk page. Tlhslobus (talk) 11:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- As a Brit, I agree too. The long scale 'billion' is never seen in the UK now. Martin Hogbin (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Completely agree. A British billion has been 10^9 for many decades now.TheMathemagician (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
International Organisations Section needed
Thanks for a very informative article. But we could use a section on usage within various International organisations (UN, EU, etc), where it can presumably be a source of much confusion. Tlhslobus (talk) 10:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Map is wrong about Brazil
Brazil is depicted with the blueish red that means "short-scale (with milliard)", but we don't use milliard; we use simply the short-scale, exactly like the US. Brazil should be normal red, just like the USA. 187.181.176.138 (talk) 04:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- GA-Class Linguistics articles
- Low-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- GA-Class Numbers articles
- Mid-importance Numbers articles
- WikiProject Numbers articles
- GA-Class Malaysia articles
- Low-importance Malaysia articles
- WikiProject Malaysia articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- Old requests for peer review