147 reviews
110 minutes I will never get back
In short, slow, boring, disappointing, well made, well acted with some lovely cinematography. The central story concept is great although never fully explored. The sci fi element of the story is an irrelevance.
Around the 50 minutes mark if started to become a slog to listen to naval gazing of the lead actors. The pace of the movie is quite languid which normally I don't mind.
There just seems to be so many plot points raised that are just never followed up on, how did they end up on the list? The film suggests that that Ronan's character puts her husbands name in the hat. Why does a cross section of society need to be sent away to space when clearly Paul Mescals character seems mentally unwell. How would he surviv3 in space? Why does a stranger from the government have live with them in a creepy, passive aggressive style?
You can definitely make a more compelling movie with these ingredients, but this film is not it.
Around the 50 minutes mark if started to become a slog to listen to naval gazing of the lead actors. The pace of the movie is quite languid which normally I don't mind.
There just seems to be so many plot points raised that are just never followed up on, how did they end up on the list? The film suggests that that Ronan's character puts her husbands name in the hat. Why does a cross section of society need to be sent away to space when clearly Paul Mescals character seems mentally unwell. How would he surviv3 in space? Why does a stranger from the government have live with them in a creepy, passive aggressive style?
You can definitely make a more compelling movie with these ingredients, but this film is not it.
- stevelivesey-37183
- Nov 8, 2023
- Permalink
Impressive acting - The piano meets Frankenstein ...
My Review- Foe
My Rating. 5/10
The impressive acting by the trio of stars in Foe from Saorise Ronan and Paul Mescal and Aaron Pierre couldn't salvage this angst ridden dystopian self indulgent melodrama for me .
For me this movie is a confusing mish mash of scenes that at times reminded me of Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf meets Frankenstein at The Rocky Horror Show.
Set in 2065 For's about the sad lives of a young couple Hen played by Saorise Ronanand her husband Junior played by Paul Mescal who oddly works in a poultry abattoir as he's married to a Hen.
Filmed in Victoria and South Australia Foe takes place in Americas MidWest and tells the story of a married couple living a life of isolation in a wasteland that's been denuded of any vegetation as a result of the neglect that our planet is experiencing today .
A stranger named Terence drives up to their home knocks on the door and tells them the good news that Junior has been chosen because of his obvious fitness and strength to be part of a relocation exercise for Earthlings to find another planet to ruin.
Terence assures Junior that Hen will not be left alone as an artificial replacement for Junior complete with all his physical prowess and his memories will take his place while he's away .
That's enough plot line the emotional drama then increases as Terence interviews the couple about every intimate part of their relationship warts and all which only uncovers more tension and angst.
The novel Foe which I haven't read by Iain Reid is promoted as a taut, psychological mind-bender from the bestselling author of I'm Thinking of Ending Things.
The screen play adaptation of the movie by Garth Davis and Iain Reid in my opinion is sloppy and at times mind numbing instead of mind bending .
The Direction by Garth Davis considering his previous great movies like Lion and Penguin Bloom I found disappointing it seemed to steer this space ship out of orbit.
However the chemistry and charisma of Saorise Ronan and Paul Mescal who is shirtless most of the movie was impressive and I hope they team up again in a better film.
Will some author please write an uplifting story set in a future where Politicians and populations overcome the terrible future scenario we are told is inevitable today ?
Perhaps it's too late? But the old saying of what we eat today walks and talks tomorrow could be changed to what we think today will become tomorrow comes to mind I'm pleased I won't be here to see it .
The impressive acting by the trio of stars in Foe from Saorise Ronan and Paul Mescal and Aaron Pierre couldn't salvage this angst ridden dystopian self indulgent melodrama for me .
For me this movie is a confusing mish mash of scenes that at times reminded me of Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf meets Frankenstein at The Rocky Horror Show.
Set in 2065 For's about the sad lives of a young couple Hen played by Saorise Ronanand her husband Junior played by Paul Mescal who oddly works in a poultry abattoir as he's married to a Hen.
Filmed in Victoria and South Australia Foe takes place in Americas MidWest and tells the story of a married couple living a life of isolation in a wasteland that's been denuded of any vegetation as a result of the neglect that our planet is experiencing today .
A stranger named Terence drives up to their home knocks on the door and tells them the good news that Junior has been chosen because of his obvious fitness and strength to be part of a relocation exercise for Earthlings to find another planet to ruin.
Terence assures Junior that Hen will not be left alone as an artificial replacement for Junior complete with all his physical prowess and his memories will take his place while he's away .
That's enough plot line the emotional drama then increases as Terence interviews the couple about every intimate part of their relationship warts and all which only uncovers more tension and angst.
The novel Foe which I haven't read by Iain Reid is promoted as a taut, psychological mind-bender from the bestselling author of I'm Thinking of Ending Things.
The screen play adaptation of the movie by Garth Davis and Iain Reid in my opinion is sloppy and at times mind numbing instead of mind bending .
The Direction by Garth Davis considering his previous great movies like Lion and Penguin Bloom I found disappointing it seemed to steer this space ship out of orbit.
However the chemistry and charisma of Saorise Ronan and Paul Mescal who is shirtless most of the movie was impressive and I hope they team up again in a better film.
Will some author please write an uplifting story set in a future where Politicians and populations overcome the terrible future scenario we are told is inevitable today ?
Perhaps it's too late? But the old saying of what we eat today walks and talks tomorrow could be changed to what we think today will become tomorrow comes to mind I'm pleased I won't be here to see it .
- tm-sheehan
- Nov 6, 2023
- Permalink
hard to buy
It's 2065. Water is scarced. People are moving to space. Hen (Saoirse Ronan) and Junior (Paul Mescal) live on his farm which his family has owned for five generations. Farming is a struggle and he works at a chicken factory. There is tension in the marriage. Out of the blue, Terrance (Aaron Pierre) comes to their door. He's recruiting for space pioneers and maybe do a little threatening on top of that.
There is an interesting sci-fi concept and an intriguing reveal somewhere in this movie. I can't buy the undercooked sci-fi concept. As a mystery, the movie is holding back a few pieces in the puzzle and the audience is kept waiting. The terrific pairing of Mescal and Ronan is giving it their all, but the movie keeps going in circles. The surrealism mounts until the movie goes down the drain.
There is an interesting sci-fi concept and an intriguing reveal somewhere in this movie. I can't buy the undercooked sci-fi concept. As a mystery, the movie is holding back a few pieces in the puzzle and the audience is kept waiting. The terrific pairing of Mescal and Ronan is giving it their all, but the movie keeps going in circles. The surrealism mounts until the movie goes down the drain.
- SnoopyStyle
- Dec 29, 2023
- Permalink
Interstellar from AliExpress with acting masterclass
Phenomenal acting, a pure masterclass of the two (Ronan and Mescal), directing, plot, script- 0 points. Such great actors in such a pointless movie, with no storyline, a wannabe artistic masterpiece, but it just doesn't go over the ramp.
Excellent movie for acting students, as well as the directing ones - how to not direct a movie.
For the rest of the world -skip it, unless you are a die-hard fan.
Interstellar, but from AliExpress, with a pinch of marriage drama and kilos of boredom, with acting masterclass.
Don't have anything else to say, this one is just for the minimum character limit's sake.
Excellent movie for acting students, as well as the directing ones - how to not direct a movie.
For the rest of the world -skip it, unless you are a die-hard fan.
Interstellar, but from AliExpress, with a pinch of marriage drama and kilos of boredom, with acting masterclass.
Don't have anything else to say, this one is just for the minimum character limit's sake.
Was this really good or really bad? I am on the fence.
FOE Review: The Cast Can't Save this Black Mirror Wannabe
The story unfolds with the mysterious arrival of Terrance, claiming government affiliation. He proposes that Junior leaves home for years to pilot a space program amid Earth's rapid deterioration. Junior resists, but Henrietta absorbs the news, aware of an extensive plan to watch over her during his absence.
Terrance integrates into their lives, conducting interviews and revealing startling visions of the future and grim truths from the past.
Despite stunning visuals and A-list talent, "FOE" falls short. Efforts to inject substance are undermined by nonsensical storytelling and awkward dialogue. Esteemed actors can't salvage the film's status, and deep conversations fall short due to a weak script.
On the surface, "FOE" presents a visually stunning experience, featuring the talents of Saoirse Ronan, Paul Mescal, and Aaron Pierre as they journey through, picturesque landscapes and delve into profound human emotions like love and loss.
Despite being the central focus, the exploration of Hen and Junior's marriage is not interesting at all.
Junior's possessiveness and jealousy of Hen's interactions with Terrance are unsurprising, while Hen expresses a feeling of stifling predictability in the marriage.
She shares with Terrance the struggle of losing her sense of self within the confines of her unhappy marriage.
Despite her evident discontent, the film persistently attempts to portray her situation as if everything is fine, thereby undermining the sole narrative thread of the story.
The film's superficial ending may prompt you to question the worth of the time you've spent watching it.
Even though it strives to take cues from the sci-fi thriller genre, specifically "Black Mirror," "FOE" fails miserably.
Terrance integrates into their lives, conducting interviews and revealing startling visions of the future and grim truths from the past.
Despite stunning visuals and A-list talent, "FOE" falls short. Efforts to inject substance are undermined by nonsensical storytelling and awkward dialogue. Esteemed actors can't salvage the film's status, and deep conversations fall short due to a weak script.
On the surface, "FOE" presents a visually stunning experience, featuring the talents of Saoirse Ronan, Paul Mescal, and Aaron Pierre as they journey through, picturesque landscapes and delve into profound human emotions like love and loss.
Despite being the central focus, the exploration of Hen and Junior's marriage is not interesting at all.
Junior's possessiveness and jealousy of Hen's interactions with Terrance are unsurprising, while Hen expresses a feeling of stifling predictability in the marriage.
She shares with Terrance the struggle of losing her sense of self within the confines of her unhappy marriage.
Despite her evident discontent, the film persistently attempts to portray her situation as if everything is fine, thereby undermining the sole narrative thread of the story.
The film's superficial ending may prompt you to question the worth of the time you've spent watching it.
Even though it strives to take cues from the sci-fi thriller genre, specifically "Black Mirror," "FOE" fails miserably.
- mendymariamKE
- Nov 11, 2023
- Permalink
Takes Two Viewings
- Mehki_Girl
- Jan 9, 2024
- Permalink
Proof that good actors don't always have chemistry
I recently reviewed a movie based on a book and noted how great it was that it didn't feel like a film based on a book. 'Foe' on the other hand felt very much like a movie based on a book. The dialogue was extremely clunky and the kind of stuff that could be fine when read on the page, but sounds ridiculous and uninspired when said out loud.
Also I found some of the direction very strange in this one. I half expected to look the director up and see a first-timer, not someone who had directed a Best Picture nominee in the past. It was little things but they kept adding up. There were scenes where three characters would all be yelling, and yet at no point would any of them stand up. There was no desire to make scenes like this in any way cinematic in nature.
The biggest crime the film commits though is that it is painfully boring. Despite having two very good actors in the lead roles, there is zero chemistry there. To be fair, the script gives them almost nothing to work with. When you have to spend the entire film with these two people and there is absolutely nothing likeable there to work with, it is always going to be a tedious experience.
The sad thing is that the idea of the movie has merit. If done in a different way, this film could have worked masterfully. It wasn't though and for that reason this was not an enjoyable experience. 4/10.
Also I found some of the direction very strange in this one. I half expected to look the director up and see a first-timer, not someone who had directed a Best Picture nominee in the past. It was little things but they kept adding up. There were scenes where three characters would all be yelling, and yet at no point would any of them stand up. There was no desire to make scenes like this in any way cinematic in nature.
The biggest crime the film commits though is that it is painfully boring. Despite having two very good actors in the lead roles, there is zero chemistry there. To be fair, the script gives them almost nothing to work with. When you have to spend the entire film with these two people and there is absolutely nothing likeable there to work with, it is always going to be a tedious experience.
The sad thing is that the idea of the movie has merit. If done in a different way, this film could have worked masterfully. It wasn't though and for that reason this was not an enjoyable experience. 4/10.
- jtindahouse
- Dec 15, 2023
- Permalink
This is about relationship drama, not so much Sci-Fi/SPOILER ALERT
- sherripadgitt
- Jan 14, 2024
- Permalink
So much wasted potential
Once it's over, it all comes together
This is not a typical sci-fi, which may account for the low ratings. It's a relationship drama initiated by a futuristic premise. I did read several negative reviews but decided to give it a shot anyway. 30 minutes in, I was hooked. The plotting might come across as slow and the dialogue cumbersome until everything is revealed, but then it all fits together and Prima facie assumptions crumble. The art is not in the unsurprising plot "twist" but in how all of the scenes that precede it build to that moment. I'll definitely be watching it again with open eyes directed to the execution of the story.
- colette-97863
- Jan 4, 2024
- Permalink
I guess i like boring movies now
- analaurabusta
- Jan 22, 2024
- Permalink
Incomprehensible and non-sensical mess
As "Foe" (2023 release; 110 min) opens, it is "The Midwest, 2065", and we are introduced to a young couple, Hen and Junior, living somewhere remote, in a world where water and inhabitable land is very precious. One evening they get a rare visitor: a guy who claims to be from the government, promises that they have made the shortlist to move to a space station. Or was that a threat?
Couple of comments: this is the latest from Australian director Gareth David ("Lion"), who also co-wrote and co-produced. Here he brings a premise (relationship drama set in 2065) that could be intriguing. Alas, without giving anything away of the plot, I can tell you that this movie is simply incomprehensible for much of the time. I kept telling myself as I was watching this "I don't understand what is going on?" and "This doesn't make any sense whatsoever." I kept hoping this would eventually somehow get better. Let's be clear: it does not get better. And it's certainly not for a lack of trying by the co-leads Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal, who try their darnest with the weak material they were handed.
"Foe" premiered at last Fall's Bew York City film festival to ho-hum rection, and I'm being mild. This movie is currently rated a mere 24% Certified Fresh on Rotten Tomatoes, and there is a reason for that. The movie is not streaming on Amazon Prime, where I caught it. As the movie came to its conclusion, I realized that I just lost 2 hours of my life that I will never get back. Don't make the same mistake! Of course you don't have to take my word for it so go ahead and check it out and draw your own conclusion.
Couple of comments: this is the latest from Australian director Gareth David ("Lion"), who also co-wrote and co-produced. Here he brings a premise (relationship drama set in 2065) that could be intriguing. Alas, without giving anything away of the plot, I can tell you that this movie is simply incomprehensible for much of the time. I kept telling myself as I was watching this "I don't understand what is going on?" and "This doesn't make any sense whatsoever." I kept hoping this would eventually somehow get better. Let's be clear: it does not get better. And it's certainly not for a lack of trying by the co-leads Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal, who try their darnest with the weak material they were handed.
"Foe" premiered at last Fall's Bew York City film festival to ho-hum rection, and I'm being mild. This movie is currently rated a mere 24% Certified Fresh on Rotten Tomatoes, and there is a reason for that. The movie is not streaming on Amazon Prime, where I caught it. As the movie came to its conclusion, I realized that I just lost 2 hours of my life that I will never get back. Don't make the same mistake! Of course you don't have to take my word for it so go ahead and check it out and draw your own conclusion.
- paul-allaer
- Jan 7, 2024
- Permalink
Utter Trash
What a waste of time. The actual story would take about 15 minutes to tell. It might make a short, but its length of almost two hours is just too much.
As for it being a science fiction tale, the only two things that are in the future are the Tesla-like car the actor playing a government official drives -- once -- and a slow moving flying ship. The concept may be futuristic, but what's on the screen is just a boring story involving three actors.
I won't bore anyone with the story, because frankly there wasn't one. This was the director's vanity project. I'm sorry I watched. I thought something was going to happen. Nothing did, and the twist was signaled about halfway through.
I stayed with this film to see how it would deliver that twist. It delivered it ham-handedly.
Utter trash and a total waste of a viewer's time.
As for it being a science fiction tale, the only two things that are in the future are the Tesla-like car the actor playing a government official drives -- once -- and a slow moving flying ship. The concept may be futuristic, but what's on the screen is just a boring story involving three actors.
I won't bore anyone with the story, because frankly there wasn't one. This was the director's vanity project. I'm sorry I watched. I thought something was going to happen. Nothing did, and the twist was signaled about halfway through.
I stayed with this film to see how it would deliver that twist. It delivered it ham-handedly.
Utter trash and a total waste of a viewer's time.
- scottjtepper
- Jan 7, 2024
- Permalink
I wanted to like it
First of all , I LOVE both of them as actors , I am a little bit in love with him and she is just amazing. They have both done fantastic work and I was amped to see them in a movie together . That is pretty much where the enjoyment ended - that these two were in a movie together.
The plot is SLOW and it is slow for no reason - there is very little character development , you feel marginally confused most of the movie , important plot points of interest are never elaborated on or explained . It was honestly just boring. You did not like any of the characters, the mixed tech was perplexing - they can live in space but don't have cell phones ? . The dialogue and writing was atrocious and just when you feel that something is becoming clear with Junior or Hen - they do something to completely belittle the point . One could say that is showing human nature - but no - in this case it was just bad filmmaking .
I haven't read the book - and this movie did not make me want to . Watch something else and let's all keep our fingers crossed these two get another chance together .
The plot is SLOW and it is slow for no reason - there is very little character development , you feel marginally confused most of the movie , important plot points of interest are never elaborated on or explained . It was honestly just boring. You did not like any of the characters, the mixed tech was perplexing - they can live in space but don't have cell phones ? . The dialogue and writing was atrocious and just when you feel that something is becoming clear with Junior or Hen - they do something to completely belittle the point . One could say that is showing human nature - but no - in this case it was just bad filmmaking .
I haven't read the book - and this movie did not make me want to . Watch something else and let's all keep our fingers crossed these two get another chance together .
- srgymrat33
- Jan 11, 2024
- Permalink
It's about relationships, and how we take others-or ourselves-for granted
Yes, like others mentioned before, the plot is quite nonsense and it bothers. It would definitely be much better If there was no space context or AI involved.
So don't watch this for the sake of being entertained.
Nevertheless, watch this if and when you're up to getting introspective, or reflect on your relationships. I thought it was provocative, and it leaves you thinking of how much we change overtime, and also, how much we idealize or come up with excuses for our partners behaviors - maybe in an attempt to sooth us down - when the reality is much uglier. And there's Paul mescal, and that alone is a reason to give it a go.
So don't watch this for the sake of being entertained.
Nevertheless, watch this if and when you're up to getting introspective, or reflect on your relationships. I thought it was provocative, and it leaves you thinking of how much we change overtime, and also, how much we idealize or come up with excuses for our partners behaviors - maybe in an attempt to sooth us down - when the reality is much uglier. And there's Paul mescal, and that alone is a reason to give it a go.
- juliahj-78778
- Jan 9, 2024
- Permalink
Why make it in the first place
- Tarpeena777
- Dec 5, 2023
- Permalink
Is it being hated on purpose?
This is a good movie. It touches on an important part of human relationships with a unique view. But many people really hated it, including critics. Does everyone want to watch superhero crap now? This is a really emotional story where two people try to find their lost love inside their loved ones. But people liked Barbie more than this?? Critics liked Barbie more than this?? How did they even become critics?
I know it's not perfect. It could've been improved. But with the acting of Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal, some great music, good enough cinematography, and a very unique story, this had to be one of the best films of this year. But I guess this will be underrated. I enjoyed it very much. I hope the ratings get better. It shouldn't have had less than 7 on IMDB.
I know it's not perfect. It could've been improved. But with the acting of Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal, some great music, good enough cinematography, and a very unique story, this had to be one of the best films of this year. But I guess this will be underrated. I enjoyed it very much. I hope the ratings get better. It shouldn't have had less than 7 on IMDB.
[4.2] Liquid in a drought
Second half is good while the first half is barely watchable
It was very confusing in the first half of the film; I fast forwarded some parts because it was unwatchable at times. Then enter the twist, things started to make sense. It was a good couple of hours spent by the end. It was nicely woven together, soundtrack was nice, cinematography was appropriate for a dystopian drama, and the acting from the main two characters was great. But the first half of the movie kind of ruins it, and even when the twist was introduced and it started making sense, it didn't compensate for my misery watching the first part. I just watched it until the end because I was curious, not because it was that interesting. But the ending was sufficient enough for me to think I didn't waste my time with this one.
- thiwankar1
- Nov 8, 2023
- Permalink
A Visually Striking Journey with Mixed Messaging
Beautiful, slow burn Sci-fi
This slow burn science fiction is set in 2065, when Earth's climate has deteriorated to the point that water is scarce and little grows. Hen and her husband, Junior, live in a remote farm house that has been in his family for several generations. Life isn't easy but they get by. One day a stranger, Terrance, comes to their door telling them about a lottery where those with certain skills are being selected to work in a new orbital space station... Junior is a candidate for selection. Sometime later he returns and tells them Junior has been selected, and has no choice about going. To make life easier for Hen Junior will be replaced by a synthetic A. I. replica. To ensure it is as real as possible Terrence stays with them to learn all about their relationship a process that might strain it.
I'm not all that surprised that this film isn't rated higher; it had the feel of a film that people would really like or really dislike. Thankfully for me I really enjoyed it. The premise is fairly simple and the twists weren't too surprising but it kept me gripped from start to finish. It is very much a character led film and thanks to superb acting from Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal as Hen and Junior I believed in their relationship with its various ups and downs. Aaron Pierre also impresses as Terrance, the character that serves as the catalyst for most of what happens. The setting adds to the atmosphere; even though we see our leads working with other people their home feels incredibly isolated. Overall I'd say this certainly won't be for everybody but if you enjoy character led science fiction it is definitely worth giving a go.
I'm not all that surprised that this film isn't rated higher; it had the feel of a film that people would really like or really dislike. Thankfully for me I really enjoyed it. The premise is fairly simple and the twists weren't too surprising but it kept me gripped from start to finish. It is very much a character led film and thanks to superb acting from Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal as Hen and Junior I believed in their relationship with its various ups and downs. Aaron Pierre also impresses as Terrance, the character that serves as the catalyst for most of what happens. The setting adds to the atmosphere; even though we see our leads working with other people their home feels incredibly isolated. Overall I'd say this certainly won't be for everybody but if you enjoy character led science fiction it is definitely worth giving a go.
I get the hate but this is good
A fascinating concept that has an unexpected focus on human relationships. Too heady & try-hard for it to reach full potential but a great look at futuristic love. The cast is strong enough to overcome the slow pace & dense dialogue.
. .
. A fascinating concept that has an unexpected focus on human relationships. Too heady & try-hard for it to reach full potential but a great look at futuristic love. The cast is strong enough to overcome the slow pace & dense dialogue.
. .
. A fascinating concept that has an unexpected focus on human relationships. Too heady & try-hard for it to reach full potential but a great look at futuristic love. The cast is strong enough to overcome the slow pace & dense dialogue.
. .
. A fascinating concept that has an unexpected focus on human relationships. Too heady & try-hard for it to reach full potential but a great look at futuristic love. The cast is strong enough to overcome the slow pace & dense dialogue.
. .
. A fascinating concept that has an unexpected focus on human relationships. Too heady & try-hard for it to reach full potential but a great look at futuristic love. The cast is strong enough to overcome the slow pace & dense dialogue.
- griffithxjohnson
- Dec 27, 2023
- Permalink
A Space Oddity with a Plothole Black Hole
In the year 2065, "Foe" attempts to teleport us into a dystopian future where the biggest twist is not the story, but how one can craft a sci-fi film with less excitement than watching paint dry in zero gravity. The premise, a futuristic lottery to repopulate a space station, sounds thrilling until you realize the film moves slower than a snail on a treadmill. Watching the protagonist's mundane life unfold for two-thirds of the film made me wish I was the one being replaced by an AI substitute - at least they might have shown some semblance of personality.
The film's central conflict revolves around the AI human substitutes, a concept as underdeveloped as the film's dialogue. The AIs, supposedly indistinguishable from humans, have the emotional range of a teaspoon. This leads to scenes so wooden, you'd think the cast was auditioning for a furniture catalog. The twist - one of the couple is replaced by an AI - is as predictable as a sunrise, yet somehow less interesting.
Finally, let's talk about the ending, or as I like to call it, the 'merciful release'. After nearly two hours of build-up, the climax is as underwhelming as finding out your winning lottery ticket is actually for last week's draw. The resolution is so hastily cobbled together, it feels like the director remembered he had a space station in the story and panicked. In summary, "Foe" is a cinematic equivalent of a missed opportunity - a space journey that leaves you feeling like you never left the launchpad. One star for the effort, and a reminder that not all lotteries are worth winning, especially if the prize is watching this film.
The film's central conflict revolves around the AI human substitutes, a concept as underdeveloped as the film's dialogue. The AIs, supposedly indistinguishable from humans, have the emotional range of a teaspoon. This leads to scenes so wooden, you'd think the cast was auditioning for a furniture catalog. The twist - one of the couple is replaced by an AI - is as predictable as a sunrise, yet somehow less interesting.
Finally, let's talk about the ending, or as I like to call it, the 'merciful release'. After nearly two hours of build-up, the climax is as underwhelming as finding out your winning lottery ticket is actually for last week's draw. The resolution is so hastily cobbled together, it feels like the director remembered he had a space station in the story and panicked. In summary, "Foe" is a cinematic equivalent of a missed opportunity - a space journey that leaves you feeling like you never left the launchpad. One star for the effort, and a reminder that not all lotteries are worth winning, especially if the prize is watching this film.
a couple
From the start, my decision to see Foe was only for actors. And , at the end, grace to image, acting , some good scenes and obvious noble intentions of director, , I was more than content about it.
The story... . The story is the familiar one - in night, the stranger with a proposition changing the life of a couple. But the house, the beautiful work of Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal , the slow rhytm and the poetry of image were only things I expected them. And this makes for me Foe as a beautiful film - maybe perfect option after a tough work day-. The twists - one confuse and childish, the other predictable but confirmed by the last scenes, are the weak parts of film. Like few couples tries of Aaron Pierce to make his character realistic.
In short, just I liked. The story is only a pretext , obvious. And, indeed, the film seems made only for fans of actors or cinematographic poems. But, it is enough. So, just beautiful.
The story... . The story is the familiar one - in night, the stranger with a proposition changing the life of a couple. But the house, the beautiful work of Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal , the slow rhytm and the poetry of image were only things I expected them. And this makes for me Foe as a beautiful film - maybe perfect option after a tough work day-. The twists - one confuse and childish, the other predictable but confirmed by the last scenes, are the weak parts of film. Like few couples tries of Aaron Pierce to make his character realistic.
In short, just I liked. The story is only a pretext , obvious. And, indeed, the film seems made only for fans of actors or cinematographic poems. But, it is enough. So, just beautiful.
- Kirpianuscus
- Jan 15, 2024
- Permalink