Skip to main content

The Impact of Impact Sourcing: Framing a Research Agenda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Outsourcing

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

Impact sourcing is a sourcing model that aims to transform people’s lives, families, and communities through meaningful employment in the Information Technology Outsourcing (ITO), Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) and digitally-enabled microwork sectors. Globally, impact sourcing may employ as many as 561,000 people and may generate as much as $20 billion world-wide by 2015. Despite the potential value of impact sourcing, there is little research on this emerging phenomenon. The aim of this paper is to develop an impact sourcing research framework that identifies key stakeholders and constructs and directs future research. The framework comprises an ecosystem of different stakeholders, including the impact sourcers (the providers), employees of impact sourcers, communities where employees reside, and clients of impact sourcing services. The framework also includes global issues, like location attractiveness, and public policy issues. Although more research is needed on all the key constructs identified in the framework, we posit that the most important of these is the impact of impact sourcing on the employees (the people whose lives are presumably improving as a result of impact sourcing) and the communities around them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.nasscomfoundation.org/

  2. 2.

    The numbers that are used for illustration are for Technoserve and are not about impact sourcing.

  3. 3.

    Best practices include contractual governance, relational governance, client capabilities, and provider capabilities (Lacity et al. 2011).

  4. 4.

    http://rtc.ruralinstitute.umt.edu/indian/nativeil.htm; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reservation_poverty

References

  • Accenture. (2012). Exploring the value proposition from impact sourcing: The Buyer’s perspective. Retrieved from http://www.accenture.com/us-en/Pages/insight-exploring-value-proposition-impact-sourcing.aspx.

  • Ashoka. (2013). Ashoka: Innovators for the public. Retrieved from https://www.ashoka.org/.

  • Avasant/Rockefeller Foundation. (2012). Incentives & opportunities for scaling the “Impact Sourcing” sector, 2012. Corporate report by Avasant consultancy. Retrieved from http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/publications/incentives-opportunities-scaling.

  • Babin, R. (2008). Assessing the role of CSR in outsourcing decisions. Journal of Information Systems Applied Research, 1(2), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin, R., & Nicholson, B. (2009). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in global IT outsourcing. MIS Quarterly Executive, 8(4), 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin, R., & Nicholson, B. (2011). How green is my outsourcer? Strategic Outsourcing International Journal, 4(1), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babin, R., & Nicholson, B. (2012). Sustainable global outsourcing: Achieving social and environmental responsibility in global IT and business process outsourcing. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balit, S. (2004). “Food and Agriculture Organization” in communication for isolated and marginalized groups: Blending the old and the new. Communication for Development Roundtable Report, 1, Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/sd/dim_kn1/docs/kn1_040701a2_en.pdf.

  • Barret, V. (2010) Silicon Valley’s Prison Call Center. Forbes, June 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (2008). Revolutions in development inquiry (1st ed., Vol. 1). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conan, N. (2010), “Inmates’ Jobs, From Call Centers to Paint Mixing,” Talk of the Nation, National Public Radio, Broadcast, December 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuoto, V., & Ashok, D. (2006) How to be an outsourcing virtuoso. (2006). Strategy Business (44), Retrieved from http://www.strategy-business.com/media/file/sb44_06304.pdf.

  • Doh, J., Bunyaratavej, K., & Hahn, E. (2009). Separable bot not equal: The location determinants of discrete services offshoring activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 926–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doong, S. H. and Ho Shu-Chun. (2012). The impact of ICT development on the global digital divide. Electronic Commercial Application, 11, 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1995). Speaker at Sustain Ability conference, for which Elkington is cofounder: http://www.johnelkington.com/activities/speeches_archive.asp.

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Staats, B. (2012). The microwork solution. Harvard Business Review, 90(12), 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorry, A., & Scott Morton, M. (1971). A framework for management information systems. Sloan Management Review, 13(1), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R., & Arun S. (2010). Social outsourcing as a development tool: the impact of outsourcing IT services to women’s social enterprises in Kerala. Journal of International Development, 22(4), 441–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2012a). A model for assessing IT impact sourcing relationships; Web paper. Retrieved from http://ict4dblog.wordpress.com/tag/socially-responsible-outsourcing/2012b.

  • Heeks, R. (2012b). The research agenda for IT impact sourcing, blog. ICTs for Development, Web paper 2012a. Retrieved from http://ict4dblog.wordpress.com/2012/05/06/the-research-agenda-for-it-impact-sourcing/.

  • Hefley, B. (2009). Social responsibility in sourcing: The state of CSR in sourcing. Presentation for Global Sourcing Council Summit, New York, June 3, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAOP. (2009). “Summary of Findings from the IAOP 2009 CSR Survey” an IAOP Research White Paper. Retrieved from http://www.iaop.org/Content/23/126/1698/.

  • International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2002). Managing for impact in rural development: A guide for project M and E. Rome, Italy. IFAD. Retrieved from http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2011/07/how-to-cite-the-dsm-in-apa-style.html#gsc.tab=0.

  • Ives, B., Hamilton, S., & Davis, G. (1980). A framework for research in computer-based management information systems. Management Science, 26(9), 910–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, N. (2007). Federal Prison Industries. Congressional Research Service, Cornell University ILR School. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/309.

  • Kaganer, E., Carmel, E., Hirschheim, R., & Olsen, T. (2013). Managing the human cloud. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. (1990). The role of frameworks in information systems research, Ph.D. Seminar final paper, The University of Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Sourcing of information technology services. In H. Topi (Ed.), The computing handbook set (Information Systems and Information Technology) (Vol. 2) forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M., Khan, S., Yan, A., & Willcocks, L. (2010a). A review of the IT outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions. Journal of Information Technology, 25(4), 395–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M., Rottman, J., & Khan, S. (2010b). Field of dreams: Building IT capabilities in rural America. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 3(3), 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M., Carmel, E., & Rottman, J. (2011). Rural outsourcing: Delivering ITO and BPO services from remote domestic locations. IEEE Computer, 44, 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M., Rottman, J., & Carmel, E. (2012). Emerging ITO and BPO markets: Rural sourcing and impact sourcing. IEEE Readynotes, IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviner, N., Crutchfield, L. R., & Wells, D. (2007). Understanding the impact of social entrepreneurs: Ashoka’s answer to the challenge of measuring effectiveness. Research on Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding and Contributing to An Emerging Field, 1(3), 89–104. Retrieved from https://www.ashoka.org/resource/4784.

  • Lorenzetti, J. P. (2002, July 3). Qualitative benefits. Government Technology, 1–2. Retrieved from http://www.govtech.com/e-government/Qualitative-Benefits.html.

  • Malos, (2009). Regulatory effects and strategic global staffing profiles: Beyond cost concerns in evaluating offshore location attractiveness. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 22, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., & Mitroff, I. (1973). A program for research on management information systems. Management Science, 19(5), 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, A., Armenakis, A., Mehta, N., & Irani, F. (2006). Challenges and opportunities of business process outsourcing. Journal of Labor Research, 27(3), 323–337. Project Management for Development Professionals. (2012). PMD Pro Guide (1st ed.). Retrieved from http://www.pm4ngos.net/index.php?option=com_phocadownload&view=category&id=1&Itemid=10.

  • Park, K., & Hollinshead, G. (2011). Logics and Limits in Ethical Outsourcing and Offshoring in the Global Financial Services Industry. Competition and Change, 15(3), 177--195.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMD, A Guide to the PMD Pro, April 2013, accessed June 2014 http://www.pm4ngos.org/index.php/pmd-pro-guide

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. (2008). Ethical outsourcing. Computerworld, 42(17), 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2012). Blurring the boundaries between for profit and non-profit organizations: The social enterprises. IESE Insight (BEN-132-E). Retrieved from http://www.ieseinsight.com/fichaMaterial.aspx?pk=89153&idi=2&origen=3&ar=17.

  • Root Capital. (2013). Root Capital. Retrieved from http://www.rootcapital.org.

  • Rootchange. (2014). Rootchange Retrieved from http://www.Rootchange.org Accessed on june 2014

  • Savitz, A., & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best-run companies are achieving economic. JossyBass, San Francisco: Social and Environmental Success.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saylor W., Gaes, G. (1997) Training Inmates through Industrial Work Participation and Vocational and Apprenticeship Instruction. Corrections Management Quarterly 1 (2), 32--43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saylor, W., & Gaes, G. (2001). The differential effect of industries and vocational training on post release outcomes for ethnic and racial groups. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5(4), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E., Stame, N., Mayne, J., Forss, K., Davies, R., & Befani, B. (2012). Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations: Report of a study commissioned by the department for international development. Department for International Development (38), 1–127. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67427/design-method-impact-eval.pdf.

  • TechnoServe. (2014). Technoserve. Retrieved from http://www.technoserve.org. Accessed on june 2014

  • The Monitor Group/Rockefeller Foundation. (2011). Job creation through building the field of impact sourcing. Corporate Report by Monitor Consultancy. Retrieved 2013, from http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/Services/consulting/Strategy-Operations/strategy-consulting/index.htmRootchange.org.

  • United Nations Development Program (2008) in Reynolds, A. (2008, September). Promoting inclusive parliaments: The representation of minorities and indigenous peoples in parliament. United Nations Development Program Advisory Committee First advisory meeting on inclusive parliaments. Retrieved from http://www.ipu.org/dem-e/minorities/faq.pd.

  • Viviers, S., & Eccles, N. (2012). 35 years of socially responsible investing (SRI) research: General trends over time. South African Journal of Business Management, 43(4), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary C. Lacity .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carmel, E., Lacity, M.C., Doty, A. (2014). The Impact of Impact Sourcing: Framing a Research Agenda. In: Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., Dibbern, J. (eds) Information Systems Outsourcing. Progress in IS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43820-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics