Jump to content

Talk:Inverse-variance weighting: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blakut (talk | contribs)
Blakut (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:
<math>\mathcal{L}(x)=-\sum_{i=1}^n\log(\sigma_i)+\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\left(x-x_i\right)^2}{2\sigma_i^2}</math>
<math>\mathcal{L}(x)=-\sum_{i=1}^n\log(\sigma_i)+\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\left(x-x_i\right)^2}{2\sigma_i^2}</math>


Finding <math>x</math> that mini/maximizes <math>\mathcal{L}(x)</math> should give the "mean" of the <math>x_i</math> values, taking the uncertainties into account:
Finding <math>x</math> that mini/maximizes <math>\mathcal{L}(x)</math> should give the "" of the <math>x_i</math> values, taking the uncertainties into account:


<math>\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}(x)}{\partial x} = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{x-x_i}{\sigma_i^2} = 0</math>
<math>\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}(x)}{\partial x} = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{x-x_i}{\sigma_i^2} = 0</math>


So then, from the above the "best" <math>x</math> is:
So then, from the above the "best" <math>x</math> is:


<math>\hat{x}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{x_i}{\sigma_i^2}}{\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{1}{\sigma_i^2}}</math>
<math>\hat{x}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{x_i}{\sigma_i^2}}{\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{1}{\sigma_i^2}}</math>

Revision as of 09:14, 14 June 2023

WikiProject iconStatistics Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Derivation from maximum likelihood?

Let there be a set of measurements , each with uncertainty , of a variable . The probability distribution function of with respect to each measurment is:

The log-likelihood of given the measurements, ( could be multiplied with -1, doesn't matter):

Finding that mini/maximizes should give the "best" estimator of the weighted-mean of the values, taking the uncertainties into account:

So then, from the above the "best" is:

Decomposing the variance from the formula, we get:

Blakut (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]