Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Noticeboard proliferation noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Wikipedia is no place for humour. Everything is very serious here and we are all terrifically important.

Wikipedia:Noticeboard proliferation noticeboard (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not useful 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. We have a lot of pages that are not useful, but exist for more lighthearted purposes. Of course this is not a real noticeboard (if it were, it would be a useless noticeboard), it's a humour page. Mark it as an essay and (if you must) with a humour template such as {{User:Yomangan/Humour}} and it'll be fine. Bishonen | tålk 11:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep per Bishonen. I have added the humor tag. Jehochman ^Talk 14:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  I respect the fact that our servers only have finite memory and that it would be useful to recover the 3k used to store the page. We should limit the present discussion to no more than 3k otherwise there will be a net loss of memory, even if the page is deleted. So please, don't leave any longwinded comments, and don't post any not-votes unless you feel very strongly about it. Jehochman ^Talk 14:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  We're already at 1.5k. Jehochman ^Talk 14:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Dang it, now 1.7k. Jehochman ^Talk 14:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  That's terrible. And suppose Bishzilla were to comment, with her heavy tread? Five words from her would pretty much use a megabyte. [Attempting to restrain the monster. Down, Bishzilla!] Bishonen | tålk 16:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

• Delete or Userfy. This looks like opinion pieces between 3 editors discussing things that date to almost 10 years ago. I can see this being funny if it was an inside joke at the time which is why I wouldn't oppose someone adding it as a userpage. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and perhaps mark more clearly as humor. No objection to potentially marking it historical as well. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 07:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep reasonably amusing. More important, a valid way of using sarcasm to make a point about Wikipedia. No particular reason to delete has been mentioned. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]