-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 158
Issues: package-url/purl-spec
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
The CPAN urls with :: doesn't pass syntax check in Python lib
#324
opened Aug 27, 2024 by
oej
updated Aug 28, 2024
Percent encoding spec and : and /
PURL core specification
Format and syntax that define PURL (excludes PURL type definitions)
RPM Namespace is Ambiguous, Need Clarity
#239
opened Jun 27, 2023 by
dariush-griffin
updated Aug 16, 2024
Make a versioned release and have pkg:package-url/purl-spec@1.0.0
#319
opened Aug 7, 2024 by
bact
updated Aug 7, 2024
Reserve LabVIEW-related package formats vip / nipkg
#202
opened Nov 9, 2022 by
samsharp99
updated Aug 7, 2024
Is "PURL" (all caps) considered an incorrect abbreviation?
#280
opened Dec 4, 2023 by
joeattardi
updated Jul 17, 2024
[vers] how to deal with problematic symbols such as brackets
#313
opened Jul 15, 2024 by
prabhu
updated Jul 15, 2024
Define package types for ASF projects (Apache Software Foundation)
#305
opened Jun 14, 2024 by
pombredanne
updated Jul 8, 2024
[PURL-TYPE: golang] fix type spec regarding path segments
#308
opened Jun 24, 2024 by
jkowalleck
updated Jul 4, 2024
Namespace clarification for third-party Debian/Ubuntu Package
#307
opened Jun 17, 2024 by
captn3m0
updated Jul 2, 2024
Proposal: Solution for Purl Type Definitions
PURL type definition
Non-core definitions that describe and standardize PURL types
#310
opened Jun 24, 2024 by
stevespringett
updated Jun 24, 2024
Debian Repository URL Format should be clarified
#306
opened Jun 17, 2024 by
captn3m0
updated Jun 17, 2024
Concerns with type-specific component value transformations
PURL core specification
Format and syntax that define PURL (excludes PURL type definitions)
Should we support a leading v in golang packages?
#294
opened Mar 8, 2024 by
TG1999
updated Mar 21, 2024
Previous Next
ProTip!
Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.