Xeon's Reviews > An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by David Hume
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
136159162
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: infinite-stars, primary-sources

Is it not uncertain whether the effect of my realizations about the disconnection of causes and effects is due to the cause of reading An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding? The most excellent definition of causation being "if the first object had not been, the second never had existed" is not true in this case since I, as with Hume, may have been able to realize this independently. It is said correlation does not entail causation, and reading Hume does not necessarily entail that it was the cause of me realizing the same ideas. It seems further experimentation will be necessary.

I submit that multiple individuals read An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding as the experimental group and have another group read randomly selected books as the control group. Then, let us have them take a reading comprehension test or perhaps have them submit reviews on some platform, call it notbadtexts.com, for comparison. Using tests of statistical significance, it will thus be able to be confirmed whether the effect of learning about the disconnection of causes and effects was indeed due to the cause of reading a book about such. I daresay this may be the most important scientific experiment on causality to ever be devised. It is imperative we test and confirm whether causal effects indeed lead to thoughts about causal effects, elsewise the entire scientific enterprise may currently be compromised.

Anyhow, the weather today was nice, and I look forward to supper.

Ah, right, but was it not also said "A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence"? Tis true, tis true... However, an experiment of such a kind would be of the highest order of evidence. Rather than theorizing the validity of those notions, such an experiment would finally make them become a matter of fact about matters of fact. For "a weaker evidence can never destroy a stronger."

We will then be able to compound our certainty by performing an experiment on the effects of reading about an experiment (a cause) on the effects of reading about the true nature of causality from a text called An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (another cause). Ad infinitum. Thus, a means has been established of having certainty about certainty, which is the greatest form of certainty.

Has thee Bayes been beaten? Has thy necessity of Kantian transcendental pure reason been admonished?
85 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 3, 2021 – Started Reading
December 3, 2021 – Shelved
December 4, 2021 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Yumeko (blushes) Mhm, wonderful meta certainty spiral, however we may need to add a limit because we won't be reaching the 'greatest' form, only greater yet :D
Anyways, I'll be there for emotional support if Bayes and Hume wrestle it out. I'll be on the winning side (idk hume looks a tad vanilla), but I like them both👉👈.


Xeon Yumeko wrote: "Mhm, wonderful meta certainty spiral, however we may need to add a limit because we won't be reaching the 'greatest' form, only greater yet :D
Anyways, I'll be there for emotional support if Bayes ..."


;)


message 3: by Dmitri (last edited Jan 01, 2022 07:48AM) (new)

Dmitri Hi Xeon, If you are interested I would suggest 'Greek Buddha' by Christopher Beckwith that explored Hume's connection with Pyrrho, Alexander the Great's on campaign philosopher. Apparently he learned much from Buddhist teachers in India. Hume himself declared himself 'a Pyrrhonist'. I'm sure other books have covered this as well: 'What is it we know, and how do we know it?'


message 4: by Rahul (new)

Rahul What's the psychological explanation of causation by Hume and reaction of Kant on it ??


back to top