OhHaiMark
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
| Resources for maintenance and collaboration |
|---|
| Cleanup |
| Categories |
| Create an article |
| Referencing |
| Stubs |
| Deletion |
| Polishing |
| Translation into English |
| Images |
| Controversy |
| To-do lists |
| Disambiguation |
| More |
|
|
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Clarifications and Request for Further Information Regarding Feedback on the Article
editArticle Draft:Thierry Rayer
Dear Moderators,
I am writing to seek your assistance regarding the feedback you provided on the article in question. First, I would like to thank you for your comments and for the work you do to maintain the platform’s quality standards.
However, I am somewhat surprised by some of your remarks, particularly those indicating that certain phrases appear too promotional. Our intention is simply to faithfully transcribe information from media outlets and official sources, such as ministries or museums. I would therefore like to raise a few points to clarify the situation.
Firstly, could you please identify the specific phrases or information that you find promotional? This would help us make the necessary adjustments while remaining faithful to the sources we have carefully selected. It is crucial not to alter the content of information from official or journalistic sources, as this might compromise its accuracy.
Secondly, I would like to emphasize that all references cited in the article come from reliable, recognized, and verifiable sources. The excerpts written are directly based on these sources to ensure accuracy and compliance. It would be helpful if you could review these references in detail, as they form the foundation of the article and ensure the reliability of the presented information.
I therefore wonder how these sources are being taken into account during the evaluation process. Have you had the opportunity to review them thoroughly? By doing so, you will see that the article is solely based on factual and verified information, drawn from credible and objective publications.
Our goal is to contribute in a neutral, objective, and well-documented manner. We would be very grateful if you could guide us on the necessary adjustments to meet your expectations while maintaining the integrity of the sources.
Thank you for your attention, and I remain at your disposal for any further clarification.
Sincerely, Inspiringflow (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Yeonjun article
editHave you completed your review? The original redirect has been deleted as requested. When will you be moving the draft to the mainspace? Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 23:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Maria Ogden has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
OhHaiMark (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)reviewing my page
edithi sir, can you please review my page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Massacre_of_Tlemcen_(1145) thanks! Diego.julius (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
I saw that you had tagged the blocking redirect for deletion. So I moved the blocking redirect out of the way and accepted the article. Please check to see if anything else is needed. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the review
The info in the first two paragraphs come from citations listed - some of which are in the language Malayalam, spoken by around 40 million folks. I could not find any more citations
The third para I got from two sources 1. by interviewing a couple of old people ( in 2020 &23 when I visited India) who had the info passed on to them thru generations. They have since passed away. Also, 2. By visiting the temple mentioned in the paragraph.
Even though the subject of the article changed the course of history for 40 million Malayalis, I plan to delete this draft - it is a losing battle. let someone else do it. Kindly advise how I may delete it.
Thank again for reviewing this anyway. Sankarnair2 (talk) 21:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Re: 1936 NIO
editGood job so far on that! IBTRACS has a bunch of storms from 1936, so be sure to add those too. Also, you might want to try finding newspaper sources. Have you ever heard of the Wikipedia Library, where users can get access to newspaper archives? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- For your first opinion, that's what I'm currently doing. And for your second, I've not been here for six months, meaning I can't access it. OhHaiMark (talk) 19:38, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ah ok. Well, you're doing a great service going through the IMD reports. There could probably be an article for every NIO season going back to 1900. It's just going to take people some time researching everything. So kudos to that. Especially finding that deadly Myanmar storm. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, while l was looking at the IMD, they stated that there were reports as far back as the 1860s, and the WikiProject Tropical Cyclones have reports going back to 1891. OhHaiMark (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yea, it could probably go back before 1900, given how many deadly storms there are each year in the basin. I was looking into the 1936 storms. This source has a bit of info on some older storms, for example that Myanmar cyclone in April produced a storm surge of 5 meters. It also has info on an October storm in India. You'll be surprised what you find just by a good Google with some specific search results. You're definitely on the right track for the article. Just try getting a bit of info for every storm before publishing. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, while l was looking at the IMD, they stated that there were reports as far back as the 1860s, and the WikiProject Tropical Cyclones have reports going back to 1891. OhHaiMark (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ah ok. Well, you're doing a great service going through the IMD reports. There could probably be an article for every NIO season going back to 1900. It's just going to take people some time researching everything. So kudos to that. Especially finding that deadly Myanmar storm. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Jammu and Kashmir Awami Ittehad Party
please help and please tell me is something is wrong in it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jammu_and_Kashmir_Awami_Ittehad_Party — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarim Wani (talk • contribs) 10:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Asking Question
editYou fellow rejected my draft Draft: Mandya railway station. I had copied and pasted from the another article Shrirangapattana railway station, why you didn't any action on that article till date or that article invisible to you? Lakyanaik Lambani (talk) 09:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Sialia
editI'm wondering whether the village actually is the primary topic for Sialia, or whether the draft should be moved to Sialia (village). What made you choose the village as the ptopic? Cheers, Cremastra (talk) 20:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Seeing as there's already a DAB on the top of the draft, I determined that the draft could be accepted like that. Additionally, most sources which refer to the bluebird refer to it as Sialia sialus, so I didn't think it needed to stay like that. OhHaiMark (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- FinnWilson (talk · contribs)
Hi! Could you further clarify in what way the page for Common Core Ontologies doesn't meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations? Is it that there aren't enough citations? It seemed like a high density of citations to me, but I could be wrong.
Your GA nomination of Cyclone Hamoon
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyclone Hamoon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 02:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cyclone Hamoon
editThe article Cyclone Hamoon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cyclone Hamoon and Talk:Cyclone Hamoon/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
your declined Draft : Md Zillul Karim Improved
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Md Zillul Karim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello
I hope this message finds you well.
I wanted to update you on the status of the draft article Draft:Md Zillul Karim. Following the previous review, we have made several improvements to the draft. Keith D, an experienced Wikipedian, has provided valuable feedback and corrections to address the concerns raised earlier.
We have incorporated these suggestions to enhance the article’s quality and alignment with Wikipedia’s standards. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at the revised draft and provide any further feedback or approval.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Bintyamin20248 (talk) 22:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cyclone Hamoon
editThe article Cyclone Hamoon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyclone Hamoon for comments about the article, and Talk:Cyclone Hamoon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 23:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)