Draft:Kishore Rajendran

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,326 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Kishore Rajendran (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 12 hours ago by Kishore Desizntech (talk: D · +) · Last edited 9 hours ago by Citation bot

Submission declined on 20 September 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by KylieTastic 14 hours ago. Last edited by Citation bot 9 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 19 September 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Bonadea 32 hours ago.

Submission declined on 19 September 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 35 hours ago.

• Comment: In addition, most of the information is unsourced. bonadea contributions talk 18:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: None of the sources meets the criteria for reliable, secondary, independent sources, and the entire draft would need to be rewritten in a neutral tone. bonadea contributions talk 18:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Kishore Rajendran is an Indian art director and production designer working primarily in the Tamil film industry. His responsibilities include overseeing the design and construction of film sets, as well as contributing to the overall visual style of a project. He has worked on several Tamil films and web series.

Kishore was born in Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu, and completed his early education at Alpha Plus Matriculation Higher Secondary School and Alpha Wisdom Vidyashram. He pursued a Bachelor of Science degree in Digital Media Design at ICAT Design & Media College and later studied at Birmingham City University in the United Kingdom.

Kishore Rajendran began his career in the Tamil film industry, where he worked on various film and television projects as a production designer and art director. His responsibilities typically include designing sets, overseeing the construction of film environments, and ensuring the visual consistency of a project. Kishore's work can be seen in films such as Agni Siragugal, Nallavan Per Edutha Kettavan, Deja Vu, Meenakshi Sundar, Ashtakarma, Finger Tip 2, and MY3.

Throughout his career, Kishore was mentored by T. Muthuraj, a well-known production designer in the Tamil film industry. Muthuraj’s guidance had a significant impact on Rajendran's professional development, helping him refine his skills in set design and production aesthetics. Under Muthuraj's mentorship, Kishore gained experience in creating visually cohesive and immersive settings for various film genres.

• Agni Siragugal (2023)
• Nallavan Per Edutha Kettavan^[1]
• Deja Vu (2022)
• Meenakshi Sundareshwar
• Ashtakarma(2022)
• Finger Tip 2 (2022)
• MY3 (2023)
• Brother (2024)

• Kishore Rajendran at IMDb

BBC | Bollywood | How Biggest Film Industry Works ? Youtube

Indian Production Designers , 21st-century Indian designers.