Template talk:Pluto

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System This template is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles This template is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects. This template is supported by Solar System task force.

Material from Template:Pluto was split to Template:Charon on 17 May 2024 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.

Why is atmosphere listed under Geology?--Savonneux (talk) 01:11, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Savonneux:  Done - Added "General" group & several items => * Atmosphere * Geology - seems better - iac - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there's an IP that has done a bit of mischief to this template. Every other planet just has one picture in it's footer template. This one has six. Would somebody please review this and revert as appropriate. I just blocked the IP for 72 hours and don't want to be too aggressive with rollback. Jehochman ^Talk 16:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All other planetary templates do not incorporate a full detailing of their satellites' features and geology. This template is the one exception, and it's unusually bulky and unwieldy because of that. As such, I propose splitting off Charon's section into its own dedicated template. Alternatively, Charon and Pluto could be grouped in "subtemplates", as Template:Geography of Mars does with Martian cartography, geology, and topography. ArkHyena (talk) 02:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with splitting it off. Dan Bloch (talk) 04:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems uncontroversial, but if there's opposition I'm happy to G7 {{Charon (moon)}}. Primefac (talk) 11:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks! ArkHyena (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]