Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-Jet Caribbean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I-Jet Caribbean

Another business plan that apparently never got off the ground. One source, a directory / trade magazine based on their press releases. Guy (Help!) 22:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 05:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 05:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An airline that operated for 6 months in 2004 is surely NN. We cannot have an article on every company registered at Companies House and its equivalents in every other jurisdiction. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. NN and cannot advance beyond stub. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C00:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find anything that would allow the article to expand further. Wexcan Talk 03:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat (talk) 07:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, this is useless dead content. - DustyRain (talk) 06:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.