Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 July 6

< July 5	July 7 >

July 6

File:Mickey Dohert Highland Radio.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mickey Dohert Highland Radio.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Content of the sample is not addressed in the article by way of critical commentary, and it is being used only to demonstrate how the presenter sounds, which also isn't addressed, and could be achieved using text. In short, it's comparable to a non-free image being used for decoration, and fails WP:NFCC. Additionally, it's longer than the maximum recommended length for non-free sound samples, and lacks a precise source. It should go. Rodhull andemu 01:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vocal technique.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vocal technique.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a journalist's recorded commentary on the vocal style of Andrea Bocelli, which is unnecessary as (a) other samples of Bocelli's style are available and (b) there is no need to have this in the article since its contents could be cited in the article and the sample linked to satisfy WP:V. Additionally, the sample is longer then the maximum recommended length for audio (30 seconds). Rodhull andemu 01:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tigersharks.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tigersharks.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Clip is not subject of critical commentary in the associated article, and is therefore merely decorative and fails WP:NFCC. Rodhull andemu 01:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons Opening Credits Circus Couch Gag.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of video clips is to describe in articles that which cannot be adequately described in text; however, the article in which this clip is used includes a textual description of the clip. This makes the clip redundant , merely decorative, and a breach of WP:NFCC. Additionally, the clip is 1.5 minutes long, which is way beyond normal limits for non-free content and there is no justification for this excess. It should go. Rodhull andemu 01:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dawkins guitu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No apparent encyclopedic value to image, no discussion in article. WP:NFCC#8 Mosmof (talk) 02:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spiegelman-cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. This file appears to be critically discussed in both articles it is used in. — ξ ^xplicit 00:26, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Primary reason is that this is not allowed fair use. It is used only in the article Art Spiegelman to illustrate his work. But (if my understanding is correct) magazine covers may only be used to illustrate material in the magazine of which the illustration is the cover. Nothing about the contents of that issue of the the New Yorker is included in the article. Secondary reason, the image is false and misleading. The Spiegelman article has it right: "At first it appears to be totally black, but upon close examination it reveals the silhouettes of the World Trade Center towers in a slightly darker shade of black." This file looks nothing like that. Granted its taken from the New Yorker web site, but just because they want to host false images doesn't mean we should. Herostratus (talk) 03:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does the image look like to you? Pepso2 (talk) 00:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The picture is also used on the article for the New Yorker. Specifically it is used in a section talking about the New Yorker's coverage after 9/11, so I think it works as fair use. --Thesloth (talk) 07:59, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Casey Brefka.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic - the image was uploaded by someone else on my account a long time ago, and after discovering it here, I do not want it to remain. Desmonthesis (talk) 06:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This could be speedily deleted? {{db-author}} is requesting deletion. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 06:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rose-mcgowan-paige.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of four fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 07:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per my lengthy WP:3O response here Weaponbb7 (talk) 13:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as gratuitous ornamentation; we have an image in the infobox to identify the character; finis. Jack Merridew 01:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Jack. Sarah 04:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CharmedFirstMeeting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of four fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 07:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as gratuitous ornamentation; we have an image in the infobox to identify the character; finis. Jack Merridew 01:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Sarah 04:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paige in Sense and Sense Ability.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of four fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 07:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. This file and two others are being discussed at Talk:Paige Matthews#Removal of files, and a third opinion has been sought to help resolve this issue. Apparently editor AniMate has been deleting many images from many articles under the opinion that they are against this policy. We are in active disagreement on the Paige Matthews discussion page. Please do not delete these images until our disagreement is resolved. Thank you.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 07:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per my lengthy WP:3O response here Weaponbb7 (talk) 13:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as gratuitous ornamentation; we have an image in the infobox to identify the character; finis. Jack Merridew 01:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Sarah 04:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prue5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of four fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 08:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Does not fail neither NFCC rule. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 20:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Will fail WP:NFCC#3a in the article which it is used, as unnecessary; fails WP:NFCC#8 as the appearance of the character when younger is not notable. Black Kite (t) (c) 07:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Sarah 11:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prue4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of four fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 08:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Plainly fails WP:NFCC#8; doesn't even show the character's face; could be easily replaced by text, so therefore fails WP:NFCC#1. Black Kite (t) (c) 07:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Sarah 11:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prue in The Painted World.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of four fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 08:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per my lengthy WP:3O response here Weaponbb7 (talk) 13:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Sarah 04:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PiperCharmedSeason3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of six fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 08:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per my lengthy WP:3O response here Weaponbb7 (talk) 13:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an inappropriate and gratuitous image per our NFCC. These tv shows are magnets for editors who flaunt our basic policies. Jack Merridew 01:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Sarah 04:24, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Piper Halliwell Season 6.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of six fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 08:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an inappropriate and gratuitous image per our NFCC. These tv shows are magnets for editors who flaunt our basic policies. Jack Merridew 01:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Sarah 04:24, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Piper Halliwell Season 8.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of six fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 08:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per my lengthy WP:3O response here Weaponbb7 (talk) 13:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an inappropriate and gratuitous image per our NFCC. These tv shows are magnets for editors who flaunt our basic policies. Jack Merridew 01:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Sarah 04:26, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Piper in Just Harried.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of six fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 08:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an inappropriate and gratuitous image per our NFCC. These tv shows are magnets for editors who flaunt our basic policies. Jack Merridew 01:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Sarah 04:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phoebehalliwells8.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fences and windows (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of two fair use images on the article, and none of them show anything significantly different about the fictional character or increase reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. AniMate 08:07, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There is no policy breach here. Editor AniMate seems to be under the impression that these images are against policy. There is an active discussion about this on one of the articles' Talk page. Please do not delete this image until this issue is resolved.

— Paine (Ellsworth's Climax) 08:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I nomed for Speedy as it is NOT Public Domain Weaponbb7 (talk) 13:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You can make a fair-use argument for such images, but this is incorrectly tagged as public domain. It's obviously a screen capture from Charmed. Fences&Windows 13:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And so I've speedily deleted it. Fences&Windows 13:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JohnSellers-1961SICover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image used on a biography (recently deceased, though image has been used since 2006) with a fair use rationale which suggests that the image is replaceable. matt (talk) 08:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eoghan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Every other image uploaded by this user has been CSDable as a copyvio or a hoax photoshop; either this image is another copyvio that I can't track down, or a photo of a real person used only for some (now deleted) vandalism where it was captioned "Victim of skanger window smashing" McGeddon (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mazar rahmatpur.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Obvious copyright violation of this Flickr image. ww2censor (talk) 16:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Masjid rahmatpur.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: obvious copyright violation of this Flickr image. ww2censor (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CSKdg.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: image is used decoration and fails WP:NFCC#8 and is easily replaceable by a free image so also fails WP:NFCC#1. It has only one rationale even though it is used in three articles and those uses fail #1 & #8 also. ww2censor (talk) 16:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Images of players in sporting events are usually replaceable. If this particular image were historically important, there'd be a reason to keep this image. That's not the case here. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete the file as it has compiled with all terms and conditions except the replaceability of the image. It is supposed to spread information on the Chennai Super Kings and it is featured in the CLT20 to create the awareness that the side is one of the participating teams in the league.

Unfortunately non-free images must comply with all 10 non-free content criteria. ww2censor (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newest DePelchin Building.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted (Author request, G7). JamesBWatson (talk) 15:27, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enormous duplicate of Newest_DePelchin_Building.jpg | Uncle Milty | talk | 19:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.