I can't recall another book I've given just 2-stars to, but still felt so enthusiastic about..!
Disclaimer:(view spoiler)[ I was gifted a free copy of I can't recall another book I've given just 2-stars to, but still felt so enthusiastic about..!
Disclaimer:(view spoiler)[ I was gifted a free copy of A Stranger North in return for an honest review. (hide spoiler)] About the Author:(view spoiler)[ 99% of self-published authors looking to promote their work on Goodreads should get in touch with Henry J. Olsen for some tips. This is my third year as a Goodreads reviewer, but only the second time I've taken up an offer to review a self-published book. Friendly, low pressure, kept in touch despite me taking over a year to get around to his book; seems like a genuinely nice guy. (hide spoiler)]
So what's the book about?(view spoiler)[ 1. This is a novella, so it's pretty much straight to the point, and all-over in a few bitesize chunks. 2. It's a post-apocalyptic, western-tinged adventure - Brin's The Postman is an easy reference point. 3. It's about a wandering hero, being stalked by 'government' forces, arriving in an isolated town. The innocent smallfolk of the town are put in danger, as bait to lure him to an outpost where the badguys can deliver a message - inviting him to come meet them. ... and that's about it. (hide spoiler)]
Come on then, why only 2 stars? *sigh* This is hard. I'm a little brain-dead tonight. Ok, I'll try. (view spoiler)[ Imagine you're watching an amateur football match, and you're totally wrapped up the game. You judge the players in relation to each other, to who else is on the field. The defence is a bit creaky. That forward's got electric pace, etc. You don't judge them in relation to the pros, because they're not playing in the same game. Books don't work like that. Every author is playing in the same game. So when Henry J Olsen steps up to do his thing, I'm comparing him to his peers at the very top end of the spectrum. David Brin won a Locus Sci-Fi award for The Postman, but I only gave that 3 stars because wandering hero adventures aren't my favourite flavour - too episodic, too prone to archetypal/clichéd encounters. Sure, they can be done well - Stephen King set the bar with the Gunslinger saga, but he created a whole post-apocalyptic fantasy multiverse for his flawed hero to wander through. However nice a guy Henry is, he's not yet competing with the big boys. (hide spoiler)]
Give me some specifics:(view spoiler)[ 1 - The prose is solid, but some of the words are a little repetitious and jar. There are 11 smirks in just 95 pages of story. There are 9 crept/creeping/creeps. These ratios aren't 'bad-writing', but they're the kind of thing a good editor would've caught.
2 - For a short novella the focus is awful dilute - however brief some are, I think we hit six or seven different character POVs in that 95 pages (John, Emiko, Nathan.. Ramses, The General... Aristotle at the end... and the barman at the beginning?) If I were editing, I'd push back on that. We need the audience to buy into the main thread, and that's John (the wandering hero) or Nathan (the homestead big-brother who needs the heroes help to save his sister). Pick one of those and give them 90% of the air-time. Sell them. Win us over. Sure, the whole cast is kinda interesting, and it's great that you want to tell all those stories, but if you've only got 95 pages to spend you've got to put all your eggs in one basket.
3 - Hero overpowered vs Antagonist underpowered. The evil sidekicks were comic relief - it's even flagged by the 'victim' that they're pathetic. The fact that the our hero gets some karmic assistance (angry mama bear!) in dispatching them just left me feeling sorry for them. And the head badguy on the scene is just clueless, uninformed, and totally out-gunned. This is never a challenge for the big man, John.
4 - Unrealistic. The safe return of the girl, Emiko is not relevant to the evil scheme. If this were a grittier scenario, well... have you ever seen the movie written by the musician Nick Cave called The Proposition? It's a wild west style movie, set in the 1880s. That film is brutal... but feels way more 'real' than A Stranger North. Emiko would've been gang raped as soon as those three rednecks grabbed her.
5 - Plot hole. If the end goal is to deliver a message, why not just walk up to him and deliver the message. Or send the girl back with the message. Why kidnap the girl, invite John to come out and rescue her, get your idiot sidekicks killed - and then deliver the message? Makes no sense. (hide spoiler)]
So... why do you stay you're still positive?(view spoiler)[ Because there's potential here. None of the specific issues listed above would have made it past a forceful editor. The ebb and flow of the story, the little details and nuances are all solid. The vision, the tone, the atmosphere, world building and scope of the land are all rich, strong and cohesive. By and large the prose flickers past unnoticed, and the story breathes - it's got life. (hide spoiler)]
There's a lot here to like, and there's a lot here to make a reader give The Northland Chronicles another chance to impress. I know the second book is already out...
[image]
Following the resounding success of my Locus Quest, I faced a dilemma: which reading list to follow it up with? Variety is the spice of lif
[image]
Following the resounding success of my Locus Quest, I faced a dilemma: which reading list to follow it up with? Variety is the spice of life, so I’ve decided to diversify and pursue six different lists simultaneously. This book falls into my GIFTS AND GUILTY list.
Regardless of how many books are already queued patiently on my reading list, unexpected gifts and guilt-trips will always see unplanned additions muscling their way in at the front.
I’ve never hit the Goodreads character limit for a review before now. *deep breath* Let’s begin.
Ripples in an Emerald Sea, is a unique, fascinating and deeply frustrating book. I had never read a self-published book before this one. I know it’s considered the ‘next big thing’ – but I’ve been living in the past, catching up on the best sci-fi and fantasy books of the last thirty years – I’ve not paid much attention to the way traditional publishing models are changing. If it weren’t for Goodreads, Kindles and Smashwords I wouldn’t have had this opportunity - and however many issues I go on to highlight with Ripples, I am genuinely very pleased to have read this book.
Before I settled down and became a devoted family man with a steady job in finance, I used to be an academic-hippy-artsy type with a degree in scriptwriting and did time as a film script editor in the big city. Once you put your editing hat on during a read, I swear, it’s impossible to take it back off.
I can see why Ripples would be rejected by a publishing company. It’s prickly. It’s odd. It doesn’t fit any marketing niche. But it’s also got a strong, original voice and some enthralling, multilayered world building. There’s a great deal of potential here.
Let’s start with the premise: Lya is a ‘provost’ (think Military Police Detective). She’s a newly graduated, top of her class, perfectionist. Lya is on her first assignment and she’s been sent to the planet Illendum to investigate a suicide, possibly linked to thefts from army stores. ‘The Alliance Military’ Lya works for is the most powerful force in the galaxy. They have neural-nets to connect their minds directly to their equipment (and each other) and run real-time combat analyses. They have femtobots (nanotech) which repair damage to their body insanely fast, making them very difficult to kill (and grant eternal youth). They have training programs which instil them with a thousand years of pseudo-experience in warfare. The ‘A-M’ are hardcore, and Lya is one of their best and brightest. But Lya has a secret – she’s found a way to duplicate her personality into her neural-net – she’s got a mind-twin called Aerie who operates autonomously. Aerie handles all of Lya’s interactions with the net, interfacing with the army base artificial intelligences (called Genies), hacking into files, etc, leaving Lya free to focus on ‘piloting’ their body. The situation on Illendum is unlike anything Lya was expecting. The A-M were meant to be there on a peacekeeping mission – but the base is an abysmal state, discipline has gone to hell, corruption seems to be the norm, drugs and violence are commonplace and the war they’re meant to be preventing has turned into all-out genocide, to which the A-M bigwigs are turning a blind eye. This is far from the shiny model of efficiency she had been lead to expect at the academy! Lya basically wants to arrest everyone, immediately, and the plot goes in several directions as she gets drawn towards whichever poor rule breaker has caught her eye most recently. She never sleeps; never stops. Lya’s on a one-woman mission to get to the bottom of this shitstorm – while remaining the model obedient soldier to her lacklustre superiors.
Normally in an editorial report I’d follow premise with plot, then a character summary – but in Ripples, the tone and atmosphere are more prominent.
Ripples is science fiction which puts a love of science front and centre. We’re talking about science in its classic triumvirate of physics, chemistry and biology. In our modern age of the internet, we have all the data of the world at our fingertips. In Lya’s futuristic age of neural-nets, she has the data of the world at her neurone-tips. She is an expert on any subject which is relevant to her investigation. She thinks like a textbook. When Lya gets in a fist fight, she doesn’t just hit you as hard as she can – she calculates the perfect pivot point about which to rotate to generate maximum impact, and will follow through on that equation with mass estimations to give you the force transmitted in Newtons. When Lya gets in a knife fight, she doesn’t just poke with the sharp bit – she analyses the anatomical weaknesses of her opponent and picks precisely which bones she’s going to plunge her blade between (with their full scientific names). When Lya plays with explosives – well, you get the point – but there were a couple of chemical names listed which took-up more than an entire row on my kindle! It’s an incredibly jarring style to begin with because it’s so precise, angular and unrelenting. It’s hard work, and it’s draining – this is not easy reading that you can skim through with only half your brain turned on. But I came to appreciate it – it fits.
Mannan is gunning for a very tense and oppressive atmosphere – and absolutely nails it. Illendum is a high-g planet – everything is too heavy for Lya to begin with, the whole planet is crushing her spirits. Illendum is a swamp-world, bleak and rotting – much as her ‘pure’ military dream is disintegrating. With so much corruption, who can Lya trust? Cue creepy paranoia inducing music. The spiky, overly exacting terminology twines through this heavy atmosphere like a tangle of needle-sharp brambles.
Where Mr. Mannan has made his own life difficult, in my humble opinion, is with his character designs. Lya herself is great in principle – the idealistic young hotshot detective/soldier is a solid archetype to build from. But how do you demonstrate personality best? Interactions with other characters. What type of supporting character brings out the full range of personality traits? Friends. Problems here? Lya has none. She had friends in her backstory – back at the academy – and she misses them. But here, in this book, Lya is a lone-wolf. The only person she has to talk to is Aerie, and since Aerie is a mind-twin, Lya is basically talking to herself a lot. Not ideal. So how about making friends? Lya tries. A bit. She’s not very good at it. I hate to say it, but some of the dialogue is horrific. Lya is trying for a kind of jarhead military banter with her new acquaintances, but these are super-soldiers with instantaneous access to mad-scientist insights – it just does not fit. Square peg, round hole – you can’t just close your eyes and ram it in there. With no buddies to bounce off, Lya becomes far more one dimensional than she could have been – she lives for the mission; the plot and the character become one and the same, only plot action illuminates personality.
Except for the tangents. Oh yes. The tangents. So Lya is bi-sexual, which is cool for a military story. Apparently the A-M is big on casual sex, but not so cool about serious relationships (because they impair impartial military decision making). So there’s a scene where Lya’s in the gym, checking out this hottie, and they’re like – I’m horny, let’s have girl-on-girl sex – boom, let’s get it on! And we pretty much never see this girl again. Sorry Adam, that’s called a gratuitous sex scene. Then there’s this other time, when a tangent literally runs into Lya in a corridor and she has to go and play a game of ptolm ball. The game is plenty cool, a kind of twisted-gravity American Football with panels on the floor/walls which unleash crazy effects. Or something. I liked it. But I also liked Ender’s battle games. And Quidditch. I like cool imaginative games. Doesn’t mean they can just be thrown into the middle of a story with no real plot integration like this. It’s clunky and dilutes the momentum.
So, going back to character. Did I mention that Lya only has one arm? I didn’t? Damn. That must be because it’s basically irrelevant, except as a constant irritant to Lya. These stupid bases are designed for soliders with two hands! Did nobody ever consider the mono-armed among us? No. Because of those crazy nano-tech super-bots which repair everyone’s bodies. Except Lya’s arm. They don’t work on that (because of X convoluted reason). But the only having one arm thing does make her combat achievements against dual armed opponents massively more impressive. Reloading guns is a bitch though. Win some, lose some.
In terms of character arc, we’re looking at a drift from protocol driven behaviour towards a more independent mindset. We’re looking at an idealist losing their naivety. We’re looking at an introvert accepting their dependence on others. So it’s something of a broader horizons coming-of-age story. I can only push that angle so far though. Two of my tutors used to argue over what drove strong character motivation. The old man used to say it came from the fulcrum where head, heart and soul vied for supremacy. The young man used to say much the same, but with head, heart and horniness all pulling in different directions. Lya is 90% head, 8% horniness, and 2% split between heart and soul. Ok – that’s probably a little harsh, but her character is so top-heavy (excuse the pun) with intellect, the girl’s a genius who triple-thinks most decisions. There’s some heart and soul in her love for the A-M ideal, but that’s such a clinical zeal it’s too slick to get a handle on. There’s some heart and soul when she misses her academy crew – but they’re backstory we never meet, and even though dramatic events are hinted at, we never learn enough to understand how it’s shaped our lass – so that avenue is underexploited too. The horniness is easy to relate too, but even that is done with such calculation that it keeps emotion at arm’s length. Lya is too disciplined to feel easily – she’s a military machine – in many ways she’s barely human, and that undermines audience ability to empathise with the character. She becomes a brilliant and fascinating specimen – but there’s always the glass wall between you.
Circling back around to plotting – probably my biggest pet peeve. There’s no doubt that the author is a smart cookie, and the chains of causality are taught and tangled, just as they should be in a mystery. But the planning behind the plotting structure is baffling. Our original case is the suicide and thefts from stores, but we don’t even find that out until after a shuttle crash, a hovercraft attack, and a psychoactive medical assault – so we’re three major beats in before we hit our inciting incident. Then we’re off sideways riding tangent after tangent. You can count that stages of our ‘core’ investigation on one hand and the overarching plot thread of ‘the big conspiracy’ soon becomes our anchor. Once that’s settled things unify quickly and the story builds up some good, strong momentum with several chapters of consistently excellent action sequences. Then comes the ending. Oh, the ending! Why, Adam, why? Everything’s shaping up for this big showdown between Lya and the evil Sylarb King. And it never comes. Nothing is resolved. There’s no climax. There’s just this... twist (if you’re generous enough to call it that), which is poorly foreshadowed, not at all explained and left me genuinely angry. It has nothing to do with the plot or character arc to that point. You may as well write “and then an interdimensional rift opened, a small purple seagull flew through it singing the A-Team theme tune and threw fairy dust on Lya”. It does not make the story better.
Adam has chosen to break away from Lya occasionally to illuminate events outside her sphere. I applaud this choice – we need some diversity. Sadly, these interludes are irregular and erratic. There’s an A-M agent up on the orbital station that gets a scene at the beginning, and then suddenly comes back into prominence with a whole string of scenes towards the end (when you’re suddenly like, wha? who is this guy?) And there’s a couple of cut-aways to the evil Sylarb King, which (apart from an extra gratuitous bisexual group sex scene) add little except to confirm that yes, he definitely is behind le grande conspiracy.
Structure is all tied in with the plotting problems. I’m not going to touch that with a bargepole today.
Pacing is actually pretty strong throughout. The action rolls thick and fast but Lya’s speed of thought keeps it intelligible. There are moments of transition that could have been improved, such as right at the beginning when the shuttle landing begins to go wrong. Lya’s just chilling out, chatting with another new A-M arrival on the planet, and then suddenly we’re in an action scene and Lya’s doing her special-ops thing to hijack the shuttle computers and save the day. There’s no uh-oh moment where we all take a deep breath because we know the faeces and fan are about to make contact. Instead it just sideswipes you, like a car crash. Dramatic, yes, entertaining – so-so.
In terms of package (cover, title, blurb, etc) – I’m at a loss – sorry Mannan. I don’t get the title. The sea has very little to do with this story. The image of a ripple in an emerald sea doesn’t resonate with the story. Honestly, I’ve got nothing. The cover image is relevant, but the overall design and colours are uninspiring/dull. The blurb is functional, but not evocative “a dream of utopia imperiled” doesn’t fly, because ain't nobody ever been dreaming of Illendum as a utopia.
Final subheading would be peers and market position – which is actually a fascinating question here. As one of my mind-book updates I tried to namecheck which books it was reminding me of. I’m going to reel these off in reverse order: Philip Pullman – His Dark Materials trilogy –A daemon is basically a soul made flesh. Great idea! This came to mind when thinking about Mannan’s gambit with Aerie, Lya’s mind-twin. Mervyn Peak – Gormanghast – there’s probably a better comparison, but this is what came to mind when thinking about the oppressive atmosphere of Ripples. Peter Hamilton – Confed/Void series – the character Paula Myo is a super smart sci-fi police agent – definitely a good touchpoint to compare with Lya. Alastair Reynolds – The Prefect – space detective again. Richard Morgan – Altered Carbon (& series) – high action, ex-military body-swapping space detective. Stephen Baxter – Exultant – far future space war, details and oppressive atmosphere. Adam Roberts – Stone – far future, escaped prisoner on a mission. Greg Egan – Diaspora – Science heavy, far future AI missions. CJ Cherryh – Cyteen – Young female genius, in complex political situation.
In summary: if I have so many complaints about this book, how the hell did it get three stars? Because I was gripped. Because it made me think. Because it’s original, and I loved that. Because it’s not a million miles away from being a great book. This doesn’t feel like a final draft to me, it feels too cohesive for a first draft – but maybe a second or third? I don’t know how many drafts a novel normally goes through – a film script will normally hit double figures before production starts, with numerous small revisions on the fly. But this feels like it could have gone through the mill at least a couple more times to grind off the roughest corners and accentuate the strongest elements. Because I feel this is a writer with a lot of potential and it’s exciting to get involved early in his journey. I’m looking forward to seeing the improvement as he grows into his voice over the coming years.
[image]
Following the resounding success of my Locus Quest, I faced a dilemma: which reading list to follow it up with? Variety is the spice of lif
[image]
Following the resounding success of my Locus Quest, I faced a dilemma: which reading list to follow it up with? Variety is the spice of life, so I’ve decided to diversify and pursue six different lists simultaneously. This book falls into my GIFTS AND GUILTY list.
Regardless of how many books are already queued patiently on my reading list, unexpected gifts and guilt-trips will always see unplanned additions muscling their way in at the front.
In the interest of transparency, let me say this: the author, Marie Browne, is a friend of mine. I’ve never reviewed a friend’s book before and I’ve been torn as to how to approach it. I want to do my bit to help promote the book because I’d love to see it do well - but then, countering that, is my honesty and integrity as a reviewer. I almost want to over-react to dispel all suggestion of a biased review by writing an analytical assassination of Qualia’s flaws – but I’m not sure Marie would appreciate that!
Rather than continue to confuse myself and fight to remain impartial and objective, let’s just agree now that I was a partisan fan from before I’d even received my copy of Qualia. Having said that, I won’t let my review collapse into boring, rose-tinted flattering drivel – I’m hoping that my extra insights into the writer, her history, life and interests, can provide an interesting perspective for potential readers.
Qualia isn’t Marie’s debut novel – but it is her fantasy debut. Both her previous books, Narrow Margins and Narrow Minds, are humorous memoirs – and I recommend them unreservedly. Those books tell Marie’s own tale about how she reacted when the Rover car company went bust and took her successful IT support firm down with it. Rather than rebuild her comfortable suburban life, Marie chose to follow her (rather spontaneous) dream and move her family onto a fixer-upper canal boat, and permanently become ‘river rats’. It’s an eccentric, charming and heartfelt yarn about recognising, appreciating and fighting for happiness – whatever that word means for you.
Now, sharing your own experiences, in your own voice with your own style, etc – that’s quite a different kettle of fishies from writing a work of fantasy fiction, and yet Marie has not played it safe.
Qualia tells the story of Joe – a human minion working for the archangel Metatron. He’s your run of the mill, one foot in the supernatural world, messenger, courier, demon-killer, etc. But then (to paraphrase the Fresh Prince) his life gets twisted upside down. His latest job is a bit bigger than he’s used to: kill Lucifer (kind of). It turns out that when you get right down to the nitty-gritty, this whole Heaven and Hell, angels and demons, malarkey isn’t as simple as they’d have you believe, and once Joe gets the chance to chinwag with a few of Hell’s bigwigs, he starts to realise he’s been batting for the wrong side for a long time. So begins a frantic quest through the multiple dimensions of Hell to deliver an insurance salesman called Graham to Lucifer’s throne room before Metatron can erase the multiverse. Joe is helped in his mission by unusual allies - fallen angels, alien demons, his hot hippy neighbour, a dead psychic and her necro-bro, a dragon, a centaur, carnivorous goats, and more eclectic friendly faces – while he’s hounded the whole way by the bloodthirsty archangel Michael and his army, the angelic host. Its one hell of a ride (excuse the pun) and as Will.I.Am would say, it’s fresh, it’s dope, it’s a hoot!
There are elements of Qualia’s style comparable to Chris Moore and Marie Philips. Considering the subject matter, it’s not surprising I can see echoes from the Sandman and Lucifer graphic novels. There’s also an unmistakable urban fantasy influence from Jim Butcher. But when I tried to tell my wife what I thought Qualia was like, the strongest similarities struck me from the screen rather than the page – Kevin Smith’s film Dogma and Josh Wheedon’s classic TV series Buffy The Vampire Slayer and Angel. It’s that same blend of humour with supernatural action, clever but silly concepts delivered straight-faced with a wink. The humour here is a much more wry British sarcasm than outright gags, but there were plenty of chuckles from me.
There are a lot of specific ideas I really enjoyed. Technically Joe is immortal, but this doesn’t mean he can’t be killed. Joe can most definitely be killed, with all associated pain; he just bounces back to life again later like some kind of sarcastic weeble toy. It makes him grouchy. I loved the way fairies (and dragons) were enfolded into the Christian mythos. The cute but lethal carnivorous goats were a definite crowd pleaser! Each of the different stages in the episodic descent into Hell were imaginative, challenging and interesting. I also thought the semi-sentient knuckle-dusters were a great weapon. There were dozens of nice little fantasy embellishments and flourishes that demonstrated a deep love of the genre.
But what really stole the show were the characters. All of them are flawed but hugely likeable. My personal favourites were the necromancer, the centaur, the surfer-dude angel Rafael and big, bad Lucifer himself. It was the moments of doubt and hesitation that sold it to me – Belial’s guilt over those he couldn’t save from Hell when he evacuated, and over the children who died because he saved one monster too many. Lucifer’s sympathy for those condemned to Hell for suicide. And Joe’s own constant, niggling insecurities that make him such a reluctant hero made him a star for me (I’m a sucker for an anxious saviour).
So what happened to the 5th star?
I think Marie has just tried to do a little too much, too quickly. This book ends on an obvious hook to continue a series – but to me, the story feels like it’s come from a third or fourth instalment in an already existing series. There’s a lot of condensed explaining to do, about the how the system of faith/magic/multiverse works which wouldn’t have been necessary with a couple of prequel adventures to set the scene more gradually. This adventure is a real turning point for Joe, but we haven’t spent enough time with Joe as Metatron’s bitch for that to feel as significant as it should – again, I just feel the defection would have carried more weight had we been a couple of books in already.
So it’s a solid 4-star recommendation from me. I think Marie’s done a smashing job with Qualia and it’s a really fun, quirky, imaginative ride. I think she should be hugely proud of what she’s accomplished and I can’t wait to see if she does continue the series (I hope she does!)
If you do buy/borrow/steal a copy of Qualia and find yourself enjoying it – please drop Marie a line! She’s a truly lovely lady and has (after a little badgering) embraced her GR author account - and I know she’d love to hear from you all.
Yeah - I liked it! It reminded me a lot of Sanderson's Elantris with a dash of May's Pliocine Exile.
The magical system - Furies - has a huge amount of Yeah - I liked it! It reminded me a lot of Sanderson's Elantris with a dash of May's Pliocine Exile.
The magical system - Furies - has a huge amount of potential, and it's easy to see how it inspired Butcher to write this series.
Traditionally, magic falls into two camps: Wizards - they learn spells/potions/summonings, etc and then carefully use them as tools to achieve the end result. Sorcerers - they are the source of magic and improvise on the fly to twist the world to their desire
Furies don't fall easily into either of these camps. Furies are elemental spirits - earth furies, fire furies, air furies, etc. People find and bond with a powerful furies when they are young, and call on them telepathically for aid. Furies are semi-sentient, semi-autonomous beings, which makes fury-crafters a lot closer to sorcerers - they think what they want, and the fury makes it happen - but the fury-crafter themselves are not the source of the magic.
It's a very clever concept because wizards are easier for audiences to relate to, because they start 'normal' and learn their way to power. Sorcerers are imbued with power, are further from 'normal' to start with, and usually harder to relate to - but are arguably more fun to write. Butcher had already written a superb wizard (Harry Dresden) - and a lot of that experience carries over here.
The actual story (government secret agent, rebel forces, chase scenes and sieges, etc) isn't particularly inspired - it's more a generic narrative shape to show-off how furies force these to be reinterpreted. Water-fury healing is awesome! Using earth-furies to raise castle walls is awesome! Using air-furies for flying knights is awesome!
It didn't quite get that 5th star, because I don't think he took any proper risks - the heroes are good and the baddies are bad - there's no shades of grey (there's a little personal-honour over factional-disputes, but that's still kind of classic for fantasy). There's no gritty, make-you-wince moments. There's no startling poetry. There's no back-of-the-neck poetry. There's no shocking twists. It's a grand adventure, and it's a really fun, enjoyable ride - but it delivers that really well - but there's nothing to elevate it into the 5-star 'whoa that blew my mind' category.
Having said that, neither Dresden Files nor Vorkosigan Saga blow my mind, but they regularly get 5-stars because I adore the characters. Neither Amara (the secret agent) nor Tavi (the brave youth) are in that category (yet)....more