HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

This Jesus (Academic Paperback) by Markus…
Loading...

This Jesus (Academic Paperback) (edition 2004)

by Markus Bockmuehl

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
931301,786 (4)None
Basically this book argues - generally very well - that there is no discontinuity between the historical Jesus and the faith of the early church. As Bockmuehl is a very respected New Testament scholar, rather than (in the first place) a theologian, this makes it a very refreshing read. The book is quite short (the main text is well under 200 pages) and very readable, relegating the more detailed discussion to footnotes, so that those who want can follow the argument, and those who just want the main lines don't get bogged down in the detail.

Occasionally I found the argumentation a bit sketchy, but for the most part his methodology is clear and consistently followed. I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in the relationship between historical Jesus research and Christology, and also to anyone who is disturbed by some aspects of modern historical Jesus research. ( )
  TonyMilner | Feb 15, 2011 |
Basically this book argues - generally very well - that there is no discontinuity between the historical Jesus and the faith of the early church. As Bockmuehl is a very respected New Testament scholar, rather than (in the first place) a theologian, this makes it a very refreshing read. The book is quite short (the main text is well under 200 pages) and very readable, relegating the more detailed discussion to footnotes, so that those who want can follow the argument, and those who just want the main lines don't get bogged down in the detail.

Occasionally I found the argumentation a bit sketchy, but for the most part his methodology is clear and consistently followed. I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in the relationship between historical Jesus research and Christology, and also to anyone who is disturbed by some aspects of modern historical Jesus research. ( )
  TonyMilner | Feb 15, 2011 |

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 2
4.5
5

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 212,553,962 books! | Top bar: Always visible